Disputes in the cryptocurrency industry are business disputes with an extra layer of complexity. Behind every token, wallet, and exchange is a company with owners, contracts, and obligations—and when those break down, the fight looks a lot like traditional commercial litigation, except that resolving it well requires fluency in how these businesses actually operate and how they are regulated.
The Jimmerson Law Firm represents plaintiffs in high-stakes cryptocurrency and digital-asset disputes. Our attorneys have prosecuted significant crypto-related matters, including an intercompany dispute over the ownership of a cryptocurrency company and a business-tort action against a major cryptocurrency company. Both demanded a detailed working knowledge of the underlying business and of the know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) regulations that govern this industry—the kind of substantive understanding that separates a credible crypto litigator from a general commercial attorney encountering blockchain for the first time.
The Disputes We Handle
Cryptocurrency litigation spans a wide range of claims. On the plaintiff side, the matters we are built to prosecute include:
- Ownership and governance disputes — conflicts among founders, partners, shareholders, or members over ownership stakes, control, and the direction of a crypto business
- Business torts — fraud, misrepresentation, interference with contract or business relationships, and unfair competition between companies in the space
- Breach of contract — disputes over token agreements, development and service contracts, joint ventures, and commercial arrangements
- Fiduciary duty claims — self-dealing, diversion of assets or opportunities, and misuse of company resources by insiders
- Asset tracing and recovery — following digital assets across wallets and chains where funds have been diverted or misappropriated
Why Crypto Disputes Are Harder—and How We Approach Them
Cryptocurrency litigation is uniquely demanding. The assets are technical, transactions live on decentralized ledgers, jurisdiction can be contested, and the law is still evolving. Winning these cases requires more than courtroom skill; it requires the ability to speak the language of the business and to work with experts who have both technical and regulatory fluency.
That is where our experience matters. Because our prior crypto matters turned on a granular understanding of KYC/AML compliance—onboarding practices, transaction records, and the regulatory obligations that crypto businesses operate under—we know where the evidence lives and how to use it. Compliance records, transaction histories, terms of service, and internal governance documents are often the heart of these disputes, and we know how to develop and deploy them.
Litigation Depth Behind Every Case
A cryptocurrency dispute is still, at its core, commercial litigation—and it should be handled by attorneys who try commercial cases. Our crypto work sits on top of the firm’s broader business-litigation practice, its trial, appellate, and federal-court experience, practice in Nevada courts since 1977, and an AV rating. For clients whose disputes cross into ownership succession, trusts, or related business holdings, that additional breadth is handled under one roof.
Facing a cryptocurrency dispute? Schedule a confidential consultation. Call (702) 388-7171.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is cryptocurrency litigation?
It is civil litigation arising from the cryptocurrency and digital-asset industry. Despite the novel technology, most of these cases rest on familiar legal theories—ownership and governance disputes, business torts and fraud, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty—applied to crypto businesses, tokens, and transactions.
What kinds of crypto business disputes do you handle?
We focus on plaintiff-side commercial disputes: conflicts among founders, partners, or shareholders over ownership and control of a crypto company; business-tort claims such as fraud and interference against other companies in the industry; contract disputes; fiduciary-duty claims; and asset-tracing matters.
How does KYC/AML regulation factor into a crypto dispute?
Significantly. Know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering obligations shape how crypto businesses onboard users, record transactions, and document activity—and those same records frequently become central evidence in litigation. Understanding the regulatory framework is often essential to proving what happened and who knew what.
Can I sue another crypto company for business torts?
Yes. Where a company has committed fraud, made material misrepresentations, interfered with your contracts or business relationships, or engaged in unfair competition, those are actionable business-tort claims—the same theories that apply outside the crypto context, applied to digital-asset businesses.
Can cryptocurrency be traced and recovered?
Often, yes. Blockchain transactions are recorded on public ledgers, and with the right forensic analysis, misappropriated or diverted assets can frequently be traced across wallets and chains. Tracing is technical work, and moving quickly to preserve evidence and pursue relief improves the odds of recovery.
Are crypto disputes resolved in court or through arbitration?
It depends on the governing agreements. Many crypto user and commercial contracts contain arbitration clauses; business-to-business disputes without such clauses often proceed in court. The right forum depends on your agreements, your goals, and the nature of the claims.
What deadlines apply to a crypto dispute in Nevada?
The same statutes of limitations that govern the underlying claims generally apply—for example, six years for a written contract and four for an oral one under NRS 11.190, with different periods for tort and other theories. Because evidence in these cases can move or disappear, acting promptly matters even more than usual.
Do I need a crypto specialist or a litigator?
You need both in one team: a litigator who tries commercial cases, paired with genuine fluency in how crypto businesses operate and how they are regulated. A strong legal theory still has to be proven with evidence, and in crypto that evidence is technical and regulatory. Our experience prosecuting crypto matters is built on exactly that combination.
This page is for general information and is not legal advice. Contact us to discuss your specific situation.
Part of our Las Vegas litigation practice.